Ministers are to undergo compulsory training in dealing with child abuse, it was announced yesterday. The assembly supported an investment of #60,000 for ministers to attend an in-service training day on the protection of children and young people in the church.
Earlier, convener of the board of ministry, the Rev George Whyte, said the Kirk had to send a signal to the wider community that it was following ''best practice'' when it came to child protection. He said: ''If #60,000 saves one child from a life of debilitating hurt and shame and guilt, would it not be money well spent?''
Only one voice dissented. Mr James Harris, of Blyth Bridge, said it was easy to understand the anxiety on the issue of child protection. However, the #60,000 cost was ''suspect financial stewardship and questionable value for money.
''The time and cost involved in compulsory training was wasteful, unnecessary, and did not address what he suspected were the expectations of the assembly.''
He failed to find a seconder for a counter motion, that ministers should be instructed to work within the guidelines of the Church's authorised code of good practice.
The Rev G M Allan Fawkes, of the Presbytery of Buchan, is prison chaplain at Peterhead, which has a specialised sex offenders unit.
He said he could not stress too strongly how important it was for people to go through all the procedures being suggested for the Church. ''Paedophiles don't go around wearing horns,'' he said. They knew all the right phrases and all the answers and could con people ''so easily''.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article