The title of Kirk Jester must surely belong to Mr Ian McGregor, the bilingual elder from Kishorn. Even when he tells the same jokes year after year (''A croft is a piece of land surrounded by legislation'') he still gets a laugh.
His debating technique is to soften us up with a laugh for the sucker punch, a sort of iron fist in velvet glove technique. Yesterday, even Mr McGregor confessed he was quite intimidated by the assembly's top-talker, the Rev Duncan McClements, who promised (in vain) on Saturday that he would make fewer speeches to allow youth delegates more chances.
Mr McClements' biggest (and best) speech so far came yesterday when his blueprint for church unity was heavily endorsed. In page 23/10 of the report he is thanked as its ''fist'' (sic) convener. Definitely a man to have on your side in a sectarian fight.
But the days of bruising punch-ups over bishops are long gone. Apart from some concern from a handful of hard-liners who equate church unity with a ''mega-church'', the far-reaching unity proposals went sailing through. Their nub is the ''maxi-parish'' ( not named after Rev Maxwell Craig, the secretary of the ecumenical body, ACTS). Nor is it intimidation which has caused this change.
There is a whole new climate of realism and co-operation between churches and this is reflected by the ease with which the Kirk has agreed to chew over what would once have been considered poison - shared parishes and ministries with the Scottish Episcopal Church and (some) smaller denominations.
Of course, it has not yet swallowed the plan, and it does not involve all the churches. The proposal today to call on the Government to end RC state schools is a litmus test of the edgy relationship which still exists between the Kirk and the RC Church in a number of areas. When the spokesman for the Catholic church was asked by one of my journalistic colleagues to comment on this upcoming debate, he snarled that he would not waste his breath since it was of no interest whatsoever. (Interestingly, he had been quite willing to comment the day before on the Kirk U-turn on the lottery).
As anyone who has written on RC or Jewish matters knows, there tends to be a reaction from both of these groups that if you are not for us, you are against us.
If you accept that way of looking at things, yesterday morning's declarations on Israel, were anti-Semitic.
However, that would be a perverse distortion of the strong and sincere feelings of support for the plight of Palestinians.
Alas, the Israeli ambassador had left before the result. If he thereby spared himself embarrassment, he also avoided the embarrassing spectacle of Rev John Harris of Bearsden South parading with what looked like a tea-towel round his shoulders.
I just hope he offered to do the washing up at the church and nation committee lunch.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article