ANTI-nuclear campaigners were predicting the beginning of the end for Dounreay's nuclear activities last night following the news that the Government's two main watchdogs are about to launch a major safety audit of the Caithness plant.
The Scottish Environment Protection Agency and the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate division of the Health and Safety Executive will next month begin work. A team of 10 inspectors will be led by NII's deputy chief inspector Jim Furness, who visited the plant earlier this week.
HSE's director general Jenny Bacon said yesterday: ''We will produce a report of the audit and hope to be able to publish it later this summer.''
Scottish Secretary Donald Dewar, meanwhile, stressed the independence of the regulators and added: ''Given the nature of the work carried out at the site, and understandable public disquiet about the recent spate of incidents at Dounreay, a thorough inquiry is essential.
''I am responsible for nuclear safety in Scotland, and the NII reports to me on safety matters affecting nuclear licensed sites in Scotland. There will be absolutely no question of any kind of reprocessing taking place until NII is satisfied that this can be done safely. My paramount concern is to ensure public safety.''
Dounreay's leading critic Mrs Lorraine Mann paid tribute to Mr Dewar for putting safety ahead of political sensitivities.
She said: ''I think this could well bring the curtain down on reprocessing and processing work at Dounreay, which obviously I would welcome. But I think it also opens up Dounreay's future which is decommissioning. Dounreay could genuinely become recognised internationally as environmental good guys. Could they handle that? Could I handle that?''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article