THE Minister for constitutional affairs, Henry McLeish, last night dismissed as a ''storm in a teacup'' speculation about salary levels for Members of the Scottish Parliament and said the cross-party steering group had barely discussed it, writes Robbie Dinwoodie, Scottish Political Correspondent.
Instead, he said, they had continued the business of agreeing how the new Parliament will operate and agreed to commission further public consultation and academic research to ensure they get it right.
''Out of a meeting lasting nearly three hours we discussed this matter for 10 minutes,'' said Mr McLeish about MSPs' pay. The Senior Salaries Review Body would look at the issue, but after embracing proportional representation he did not think they would want a two-tier structure of members.
On whether Holyrood pay scales should match Westminster, he said: ''At the end of the day there is no substantial reason why there should be differences, but it's important that you don't have MSPs voting on their own pay and conditions.''
A number of new initiatives emerged last night:
q A series of 10 seminars will be convened around Scotland, half by the Scottish Consumer Council and half by the Rural Forum to gauge grass-roots views;
q Leading academics and organisations are being shortlisted to carry out research on single-chamber Parliaments elsewhere in the world and issues such as the use of new technology and links between Edinburgh, Cardiff and London;
q The intention is to have a full-scale Hansard-style record of proceedings;
q Recognition that more work is required on the need for pre-legislative scrutiny, and the timetabling of the Parliament's business.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article