I FIND no surprise in the fact that sitting Labour MPs are being rejected as potential MSPs (May 14). I believe this is simply the latest manifestation of what New Labour strategists refer to as ''The Project'', that is the subversion of an ostensibly socialist party into a right-of-centre organisation which appeals to mainstream Tory voters.
Given the difficulties it is already experiencing after barely a year in office, it looks highly unlikely that the Labour Government will enjoy after the next General Election the massive Commons majority it currently commands (assuming Labour do win next time).
Tony Blair will clearly recognise the importance of party discipline in managing a small majority, and it seems inconceivable that he will tolerate in future the sort of backbench criticisms and rebellions which have arisen since May 1 last year.
I am convinced that in due course Labour will introduce revised selection criteria for Westminster candidates, which will be used to dump irritants such as Diane Abbot, Jeremy Corbyn, and George Galloway.
No doubt Labour supporters will rubbish this suggestion, and point out that it would breach party rules. However, New Labour activists have not allowed such trifling considerations to stand in the way of their Project in the past and I see no reason why they should start doing so now.
Tony Gilbert,
104 Dalry Road, Edinburgh. May 14.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article