A mother found guilty of killing her severely handicapped daughter by disconnecting her breathing tube yesterday sobbed as the Court of Appeal quashed her manslaughter conviction.
Former psychiatric nurse Julie Watts, 32, was cleared of murder by a Manchester Crown Court jury last September, but convicted of the manslaughter of her 14-month-old baby, Abigail.
Mrs Watts, of Little Hulton, Greater Manchester, who was given an 18-month jail sentence suspended for two years, went to the Court of Appeal in London to urge three judges that her conviction was ''unsafe''.
In court with her husband ,Andrew, she wept as Lord Justice Swinton Thomas, sitting with Mr Justice Connell and Mr Justice Poole, allowed her appeal.
Later she said: ''This whole thing should never have happened. No-one could ever imagine what we have been through.''
Abigail was born with clover leaf syndrome, a skull deformity, which left her brain-damaged, deformed, partially-sighted, deaf, and unable to breathe or feed without help.
At the end of July 1995, staff at the Royal Manchester Children's Hospital responded to Mrs Watts' cries for help and found that the tracheotomy tube had become detached from Abigail's throat. The child suffered respiratory failure leading to cardiac arrest.
Mrs Watts, who has a nine-year-old son and a daughter born in November 1996, has always denied interfering with the tube.
At the Court of Appeal, the three judges ruled that the trial judge, Mr Justice Sachs, had not given a particular direction he should have done in summing up on the issue of manslaughter.
Allowing the appeal, Lord Justice Swinton Thomas said:''We cannot be sure that if he had done so the jury would necessarily have arrived at the same conclusion.''
During the hearing, Mr Richard Henriques QC, counsel for Mrs Watts, had claimed that there was a ''real possibility'' the tube was removed by an unknown third party.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article