THE devil is in the detail as far as British Energy's plans for expansion into North America are concerned.
The focus is on Ontario Hydro, which has a larger nuclear generating capacity than that of British Energy in the UK but with older technology.
And as British Energy is the biggest player in Britain, an enlarged portfolio has obvious benefits, even if the size of the eventual Canadian holding remains unclear.
With the provincial government talking about a public-private partnership, British Energy may end up with a quarter of the equity. But even that is not assured - there are perhaps another three or four other potential bidders for Ontario Hydro all with the experience to gain regulatory approval.
However, the share price yesterday indicated that the company was doing the right thing in targeting North America even if the full-year results were well above most expectations. There was general acclaim for the way costs have been reduced since privatisation two years ago.
There is more to come from the integration of Scottish Nuclear and Nuclear Electric, while the upgrading of profit forecasts for the next two years will enable the company to make a substantial acquisition.
Such a move will be underpinned by strong cash generation which has eliminated #700m of debt since flotation.
The indications are that there will be some payment to investors holding what has been one of the best performing FTSE-100 stocks.
Cash is perhaps the least of its problems and the special dividend may be a taste of the near future, with North America and UK diversification in prospect.
Unless there is a major plant shutdown well beyond the statutory period, the sun will continue to shine brightly upon British Energy shareholders.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article