TRAINSPOTTING author Irvine Welsh has caused a storm in Australia by acting like one of the foul-mouthed characters in his books, writes Cameron Simpson.
At a debate, Welsh swilled beer, launched a four-letter tirade at organisers, then silently read one of his own books.
The Scots novelist was flown to Australia to take part in the Sydney Writers' Festival but has refused to help publicise the event.
All requests for interviews have been turned down but a spokes-man insisted he would ''fulfil his obligations''.
However, he left officials choking on their mineral water when he turned up for a debate on English literature in Sydney Town Hall.
He blasted the warm welcome given to him by chairwoman Louise Adler, then gave a one-line defence of his controversial novels.
Welsh told the invited audience: ''I'll try to ignore that bullshit introduction. There's f. . . all to say about my books other than what's written in them.''
He spent the rest of the night knocking back bottles of beer while reading one of his own books and taking no further part in the debate.
One academic at the debate said: ''Welsh gave a performance which would have made Sid Vicious proud. At least it proves there's plenty of room in the stuffy world of literature for the sort of excesses normally associated with rock'n'roll.''
A festival spokesman said: ''Irvine is a unique talent with an individual way of expressing himself.''
Welsh, who acts as his own agent and manager, was unavailable for comment.
qA Canadian author was last night named the winner of a prestigious award for women writers.
Carol Shields won the Orange Prize for Fiction and #30,000 for her novel, Larry's Party.
She was given the award, made annually for the best novel written by a woman and published in the UK, during a ceremony at The People's Palace in London's Royal Festival Hall.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article