THE law on imitation and replica firearms is to be reviewed by the Scottish Office.
Scottish Home Affairs Minister Henry McLeish, who has indicated a fresh look is to be taken at the issue, has admitted, however, that control of such guns had proved a problem, especially on defining ''imitation firearm''.
''Water pistols and other traditional children's toy guns are perfectly acceptable to most people. It has proved very difficult to draw a workable distinction in law between these and more realistic replica and imitation guns.''
Despite this, Mr McLeish said the Government was determined to find ''a workable solution''.
Assistant Chief Constable Tom Wood, of Lothian and Borders Police, has said pranksters with imitation firearms put themselves in danger as such incidents had to be dealt with by an armed response unit. This year Lothian and Borders Police Board wrote to Mr McLeish expressing its concerns on the issue.
In reply, the Minister said courts already had available heavy penalties to deal with criminal misuse of an imitation firearm and the Firearms (Amendment) Act 1994 had extended the range of offences covering this misuse.
Nevertheless, he said, the Scottish Office fully recognised that imitation and replica guns continued to cause problems. He said with the total ban on handguns in place, there would be a fresh look to see what further measures might be necessary. ''The law on imitation and replica firearms will be included as part of that exercise.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article