IT begins in a manner not unbefitting of how it ends a mere 45 minutes later. In walking on-stage and demanding ''Are you mad for it?'', Liam Gallagher was, in hindsight, asking a loaded question. The empty carry-outs outside and cannabis fog over parts of the no-smoking arena should have answered his rhetorical question. Glasgow was, indeed, ''mad for it''.
Following a protracted version of Wonderwall, the band march off after a bottle was allegedly thrown at the stage. Minutes later an announcement goes out that the band ''have never tolerated that sort of behaviour and have left the building''. The idea of Oasis as behavioural role models is as preposterous as their reason for getting out of the building is good. That the ensuing reaction from significant sections of the crowd is racist, violent and loutish, says much about both band and following.
As is often the case with Oasis, the sideshow will grab more self-perpetuating headlines than the show itself, which apart from its brevity was as uninspiring as ever. Brilliantly obvious, Noel Gallagher's songwriting grabs skilfully from the past and never once deviates from its mid-tempo, chart-topping formula. Plodding pub rock, with added egos, seems to be what the audience are ''mad for''.
However, the way the audience turns in the space of 10 minutes shows the weakness of the foundations on which Oasis's success is built. This show, coupled with the decrepitude of the Be Here Now album, has a distinct beginning-of-the-end feel. See you, Oasis.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article