THE old adage money can't buy you happiness will ring true for Glasgow City Council today, when the smile is wiped off the face of the city.
Almost 15 years since he made his first appearance around the city, the Mr Happy character and the Glasgow's Miles Better campaign will come to an end.
Despite a reduction in Mr Happy's exposure, copyright for the Roger Hargreaves character and the logo cost #28,000 for last year alone and, due to the council's spending cuts, it will not be renewed when it runs out today.
Mr John Brown, the council's head of public relations and marketing, said it was not felt appropriate to spend money on the campaign in the current climate.
''With the problem of paying fees for copyright, and then the high promotion costs, we just don't have the money for it,'' he said.
However, he added that the end of Mr Happy did not mean that the council would stop promoting the city this summer and it already had a number of thoughts on possible campaigns to replace Mr Happy.
He said: ''People will still identify the Glasgow's Miles Better campaign with the city and that will not end for the time being.
''Just because the copyright has ended, doesn't mean Mr Happy's association with Glasgow will.''
The idea behind the campaign was conceived in 1982 when the then Lord Provost Michael Kelly returned from a trip to New York, where he had been impressed with the success of the city's I Love NY campaign.
The following year, the Glasgow's Miles Better campaign was launched during a heatwave in an attempt to change Glasgow's image as a city of violence, drugs, and slums.
Other than a brief spell when it was replaced with the Glasgow's Alive promotion, Mr Happy has beamed out across the city ever since, most notably from the blue gas tower next to the M8.
Mr Kelly, who now works as a consultant, said he was not surprised the campaign had lasted so long.
He said: ''The I love NY campaign had already been running five years when I went to New York and we felt that if we got it right, it would work long term, so I'm not surprised that it lasted so long.''
After the initial plan to promote the city, a suitable logo had to be established.
Mr Kelly said: ''We carried out a competition in the old Sunday Standard for the campaign and one of the entries was Glasgow makes me smile.
''This really brought about the idea of smiling and this, coupled with the fact that Glasgow was perceived as a friendly city, led to the Glasgow's Miles Better slogan. The reason the words really caught on I think was because the people of Glasgow were able to articulate their feelings and what they really believed about the city.
''For years they had seen television people coming up and making documentaries holding up Glasgow as everything that was bad about cities, and now they had some way of defending it.''
However, he said, he felt that although the logo was still relevant, Mr Happy himself might be past his day.
''It was a 1970s character and the problem now is that he's out of date.
''Also, if you are trying to promote health, then a wee, round fat figure for a logo is perhaps not a positive image to have.''
Next month, Mr Kelly is going to Lublin in Poland to sell the concept behind the campaign, and he felt it was important for Glasgow to still have some sort of similar promotion behind it.
He said he hoped the words Glasgow's Miles Better could still be used in some sort of promotional sense and added: ''I think the reality is the city is going to have to promote itself and needs some sort of logo, especially if we are going to sell it abroad at a time when it is so important in the international market.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article