I HAVE enjoyed the ''Tried and Tested'' series of articles but find today's ''It's in the bag and no bones about it'' a maddening example of misdirected consumerism.
All right, most of your readers can afford to buy soup but surely most of your readers are not accountants, maths teachers, or arithmetical wizards - how can an ordinary human being compare prices per pint, litre, and gramme?
And who, other than someone with no sense at all, would compare vegetable soup with salmon and dill? You might as well compare a mutton pie with a chicken vol-au-vent; if it were an occasion for one it would not be an occasion for the other.
I have cooked for a farming family for 40 years and use my share of packets and tins but I still balk at the price of ''fresh'' soups: #1.89 a pint (568ml is a pint on my measuring jug) and it isn't even alcoholic!
Not many mothers would have made spicy sweet potato and butternut squash soup but a pint of leek and potato would take a leek, a potato, a stock cube, a pint of water, and half an hour - less in a microwave. I could make half a gallon of soup for less than 50p - how much would that be a gramme?
Those of us who cook fresh food every day for our families do still exist. Cooking seems to me to relegated by the media to the status of a middle-class hobby. The attitude seems to be that poor people use tins and rich people go to Marks & Spencer.
Joyce Hunter Blair,
Marbrack, Carsphairn,
Castle Douglas.
May 7.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article