Sierra Leone
WHO owns Sandline, the company which has brought Robin Cook low while propping up General Kabbah? The man who runs it, Lieutenant-Colonel Tim Spicer, claims that he has no idea. He just goes quietly about his arms-and-advice business, never troubling who pays the salary. But the identity of this person or persons unknown, confidentially recorded in a Bahamas bank vault, may prove to be highly significant.
Sandline's offices at 535 King's Road, Chelsea, are just across the corridor from the executive suite of the millionaire businessman Tony Buckingham. Sleuths revealed this weekend that Spicer and Buckingham are chums, possibly even colleagues, their interests separated only by a few feet of expensive carpet.
Buckingham is the main shareholder of Diamond Works, a company which owns one of the biggest diamond mines in Sierra Leone. Sandline went to the aid of General Kabbah when he was deposed by the same rebels who were attacking the diamond mine. Was Sandline supplying arms, mercenaries, and helicopter parts to defend a democratically-elected President - or to protect an associate's diamond mine? If Sandline is owned by Buckingham, which is the more likely answer?
Buckingham's company has invested more than #6m in a mine estimated eventually to be worth #800m. One of his fellow shareholders, the Indian-born Thai banker Rakesh Saxena, has already underwritten Sandline's aid to Sierra Leone to the tune of #1m. He is only one of the many millionaires who stand to gain a fortune from the reinstatement of Kabbah. The massive mining conglomerate De Beers, which also has interests in Sierra Leone, is reported to have expressed its anxieties to the High Commissioner, Peter Penfold. Our Man in Freetown, as we know, turned promptly to those offices in Chelsea.
De Beers hadn't even set up office in Freetown when the coup occurred in April, 1997. More established companies were immediately affected. The coup scuppered the British brewery which makes every pint drunk in Sierra Leone. It interrupted the lucrative sales of British cigarettes. Beyond even the beer and fags, it ruined the profitable trading of Barclays Bank and Standard Chartered, the two banks which between them carved up 80% of the country's business. Is it any wonder that Peter Penfold looked to London for help?
You might expect some of these companies to club together to pay at least part of the fees to Sandline. The estimated bill, #10m, doesn't seem much in exchange for collective interests worth many billions. But Saxena appears to be
the sole donor so far and he is
only an underwriter. The bill will have to be paid in the end by the people of Sierra Leone.
For Sandline stipulates that it deals only with ''lawful governments'' and cannot do business with anyone else. This bid for probity, legitimacy, and respect sounds remarkably like Cook's supposedly ethical foreign policy.
But just how ethical is Sandline's code of practice? The poverty-stricken people of a ravaged country are now being forced to pay a price for democracy that the rich businessmen like Buckingham could better afford, especially if it meant safeguarding the source of his wealth.
One of the nasty circularities to this tale is that another of the companies with which Sandline is associated, the ''military consultancy'' Executive Outcomes, is still waiting to be paid millions of dollars for aiding General Kabbah's regime during the previous civil war in 1996. Executive Outcomes would have stood little chance of getting its money back unless Kabbah had been restored with the help of Sandline. Spicer's company has made a great many businessmen happy without charging them a single penny.
A couple of miles from Chelsea, the Foreign Secretary struggles to defend his definition of an ethical policy. It mostly seems to consist of upholding UN resolutions, even when those resolutions are profoundly inadequate, as they were in the case of Somalia, as they are with regard to the war in the Western Sahara which has been going on for nearly 30 years without active intervention from the UN.
The resolution against Sierra Leone was typically loosely-worded, advising sanctions against the junta to cut off its life force. What Sandline did, as the pilot who flew the arms from Bulgaria to Liberia and eventually Sierra Leone has testified, was to supply the EcoMog forces who fought to restore General Kabbah. Those forces were backed by the UN itself, so why
would it be a breach of the UN resolution to arm them?
In the months to come, as Spicer defends his company against blame and the Government conducts an arms-to-Africa inquiry, the questions will all be about who knew what, when they knew it, and why they told nobody else. Yet everyone involved in this affair, from the politicians and civil servants to the arms dealers and Barclays Bank, has the same quite proper aspiration, which was to see democracy restored. The real scandal is that the Foreign Secretary didn't take the initiative: obtain the UN's support, issue the necessary waivers, and conduct an open, vigorous campaign for Kabbah where government has an enabling role and the private sector stumps up the cash. Mr Cook appears content to will the ends, but not the means. That's no way to secure ethical outcomes.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article