There is concern on Tayside that devolution to Edinburgh will bring a new form of centralisation. The area already sees large transport projects to its south taking a big percentage of public spending.
For that reason it is not worried by the fact that responsibility for transport has not been given to the Scottish Parliament. ''Transport has to be seen in a European or UK context,'' said Harry Terrell, left, chief executive of Dundee and Tayside Chamber of Commerce and secretary of the Federation of Dundee and Angus chambers. ''We will see how it works out.''
Instead there is fear that a Scottish Parliament dominated by central belt interests will have little regard for Tayside's needs unless it raises its voice. The Chamber is already lobbying to have Scottish Government departments moved to Dundee.
''We have made representations on Government offices,'' said Terrell. ''We are lobbying for decentralisation with the Scottish Parliament. The fear is that things will be centralised in Edinburgh.
''It is up to us to press hard. We are not trying to cherry-pick particular departments but there are a number of administrative functions which, with technology, could be located outside of Edinburgh.''
The proportion of public money spent on projects of interest to the central belt is an irritant. ''We have the M74 and the amount of money that has been spent on it, then you reach the part before the M6 the English don't see the route going north as having a high priority.
Far less likely is its wish for a single international airport in the central belt. According to air industry sources the last time it was costed the bill came in at #800m: "When you look at the proportion of population and voting power in Scotland, the Scottish Parliament is going to be dominated by the central belt and west coast," said Terrell.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article