A disappointing performance on the pub side had a bigger effect upon City sentiment towards Vaux than the positive outcome at Swallow Hotels.
The Sunderland-based company is in the throes of choosing a chief executive, with chairman Sir Paul Nicholson seeking to give up his day-to-day control of the business some time this summer.
In the half year to March 21, pre-tax profits were ahead by 8% to #16.6m, excluding the losses on the disposal of poorly performing pubs amounting to over #700,000.
Swallow was the star performer, with like-for-like profits ahead 14% to #12.2m and the 32-strong chain winning high marks in quality and customer surveys.
There are four Swallow hotels in Scotland - in Inverness, Glasgow, Dundee and Edinburgh.
Divisional director Peter Catesby said he reckoned that the hotel cycle had another 18 months to run before turning down - he added that he would not look at any of the 30 hotels Thistle has put on the market.
Last month, Swallow completed the #20m acquisition of the Manor Hotel to give it three properties in East Anglia, and these will cover its financing costs in the remainder of this year.
Sir Paul's younger brother, Frank, who is being passed over for promotion because of the family connection, said he was disappointed by the performance of the 180 managed pubs. These are facing increased competition in the North of England from Scottish & Newcastle and Bass, as well as from new entrants such as JD Wetherspoon, in a market that is showing little real growth.
Vaux is trying new concepts in its retailing such as Barcentro, which is aiming for business and shopping trade at lunchtime and a younger clientele in the evening.
The downturn in the return from the tenanted estate has now ceased. Meanwhile, the brewing and wholesaling side brought in just 7% of operating profits.
The interim dividend has been raised marginally to 3.85p
The shares eased 3p to 267.5p
See Comment
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article