THE City impatiently awaits the appointment of Vaux Group's new chief executive.
Executive chairman Sir Paul Nicholson hopes to announce the name within several weeks and, in due course, Sir Paul will take up a non-executive role.
However, he indicated that he will stay very closely involved in the business. Until then analysts remain uncertain as to where the Sunderland-based brewer and owner of Swallow Hotels is going. That question is likely to remain unanswered for some time until the new incumbent's plans are revealed.
Vaux is a company of two halves, with little overlap between the highly-regarded hotels side and the more mundane brewing and pub retailing interests.
The City would like it to sell the two breweries in Sunderland and Sheffield and for it to concentrate on exploiting its pubs, which do not seem to be making progress against industry majors such as Whitbread. However, Sir Paul is adamant that brewing will be retained, partly in deference to a tradition going back more than 100 years.
That immediately restricts the new chief executive's scope for action in a business that, overall, is returning a low level of investment on capital employed and where early improvement is unlikely, given the relatively low incomes in its main trading
areas compared with in the rest of Britain.
Expansion by Swallow is likely to be limited to openings at a rate of perhaps two a year. Sensible acquisition prospects are restricted due to the sector's buoyancy. The feeling is that Vaux needs a little more drive than at present and a better sense of direction.
Analysts were pulling back their forecasts for its full-year profits by about #1m to an increase from #38.3m to #40.5m. Regrettably, the stock looks a dull hold.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article