AN American company has had exploratory talks with Government officials about the possibility of running ''failing'' British schools for profit, its chairman revealed yesterday.
Mr Benno Schmidt Jr, chairman of The Edison Project, said: ''Officials at the Department for Education and Employment have suggested this might well be legal . . . and that there could be interesting possibilities on this front.''
Edison runs 25 schools in the US on contract to school districts, the American equivalent of local education authorities. It claims high success rates with previously under-achieving pupils, and a commercial return - through using public money more efficiently - of as much as 7%.
Mr Schmidt was scheduled to explain how the company's programme had ''transformed'' state schools in America, at a lecture before the Institute of Economic Affairs, a right-wing think tank, in London, last night.
Official interest in Edison's potential role in British schools has, however, angered teachers' leaders - after a commitment from Education Secretary David Blunkett that firms would not be allowed to make a profit through involvement in Education Action Zones.
Mr Doug McAvoy, general secretary of the National Union of Teachers, said: ''We have a very clear commitment from the Secretary of State for Education that organisations will not be allowed to run schools for profit in this country.''
A Department for Education and Employment spokesman confirmed the discussions with Edison, and said: ''No commitments have been made, but we are always interested in new ideas.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article