I READ with interest the Rev Bill Ferguson's letter, The cost of funerals (May 5), having recently settled my late father's affairs.
I am appalled at the cynical level at which the previous Government of supposedly caring Conservatives set the level at which those requiring long-term residential nursing care qualified for full State payment of nursing-home fees. The sum of #3000 left to a patient by the State would, at the time at which the level was set, be sufficient to cover the cost of a simple funeral plus the necessary legal fees incurred in winding up the patient's estate on death.
The current levels at which State help with nursing home fees is given, though marginally better, have not been increased to take account of inflation. It must be noted that the Labour Government has not introduced interim measures to raise these levels prior to the Royal Commission on the Long-term Care for the Elderly completing its work, and is therefore allowing the situation of those in care to deteriorate.
I am surprised that in a survey carried out for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (May 5) only half of the children of those care-home residents surveyed who had ''effectively been disinherited'' were angry. Perhaps they were less affluent than the rest who had ''accepted the inevitable''?
How can those less well-off carers, who have been ''effectively disinherited'' and who are likely to have been contributing to the cost of their loved ones' care themselves, provide for their own old age? How many will become homeless and destitute before something is done? Will carers who have been ''effectively disinherited'' be compensated?
Margaret M H Lyth,
26 Gardenside Street,
Uddingston.
May 5.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article