Crippling consolidated overdraft
A FUNDAMENTAL reappraisal of the method of allocating capital and revenue resources through local authorities is required, and the restructuring of local government has failed to address this need.
During the 1950s and 1960s Conservative and Labour Governments channelled capital into council house building infrastructure and public building developments and now that these developments are deteriorating their condition is condemned as the cause rather than the effect of social disintegration.
It is a fact that the space standards and construction standards of the majority of public-funded building projects during these periods exceeded those of the private sector, and the reason for their condition is neglect and lack of maintenance.
Excellent buildings of international status by Coia and Spence have been demolished while enlightened and misguided local authority housing developments have fallen into disrepair due to lack of programmed maintenance and inadequate revenue funding.
The Glasgow council taxpayer is still paying a substantial portion of tax to fund borrowing from the 1950s and 1960s to construct houses which are now being demolished. This consolidated overdraft is crippling Glasgow's potential.
I suggest that Cosla should approach central Government to write off the historic local authority debts and that area budgets should be allocated for both capital and revenue within local authorities to provide democratic control of resources.
Housing associations, residents' associations, councillors, and community councillors would have an input at this level, with regular consultative meetings with local people and with guidance and implementation by appointed professionals. Glasgow and other local authorities have tremendous potential for further regeneration but local community control is essential to produce a purpose designed local environment. The community housing association movement has demonstrated this potential and this model should be developed for community resources, community planning and architecture.
John M Pollock,
Tandlemuir House, Lochwinnoch.
January 27.
Wrong priorities
ON the day Glasgow District Council endorsed hundreds of redundancies and sweeping cuts in services, it was reported that Britain intended to send HMS Invincible to join 30 British and American warships in the Gulf.
In spite of the efforts of ambulance crews, the service is a shambles. We cannot afford to rescue a sick or injured old lady from a rubbish-strewn street promptly, but send another aircraft carrier to the Gulf? Nae bother.
Surely a case of fur coat and nae knickers?
Hughie Healy,
230 Kenmure Street, Glasgow.
January 27.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article