THE news that there is #25m more for Scottish education than announced in the local authority settlement has brought additional hope to the small rural communities in Argyll who are threatened with the closure of their local schools.
Argyll and Bute Council, while window-dressing their case for closure with words such as ''rationalisation'', have constantly drawn attention to the financial strictures under which they operate and the need to save money by amalgamating schools.
But published savings are minuscule once the cost of teachers (who will continue in the authority's employment), school meals (which will continue to be needed wherever the children find themselves), and transport (which will actually increase) are taken into account.
The closure of Kilmodan School from August 1999 would actually save less than #10,000 per annum on the most favourable reading of the council's figures, and nothing at all on an alternative analysis; #10,000 is 0.04% of the additional money announced by Brian Wilson, but its addition to the Argyll and Bute Council budget would preserve two high quality jobs in our community, allow a community focus to continue. enable the community to continue to attract younger couples with children, and perpetuate high quality education that is respected and appreciated by every family in the area.
It will also mean that the whole issue of rural schools and their value could be properly debated by the new Scottish parliament, allowing that body to set the agenda for Scottish education in the new millennium, not have its hands tied by premature and short-sighted decisions made on the very eve of its establishment.
The same argument applies to virtually all the rural schools presently threatened by closure throughout Scotland. It is an argument about the future of whole communities and it can be solved now by the application of a tiny fraction of the Chancellor's largesse
Michael W Russell,
Chair,
Kilmodan School Action Committee,
Feorlean, Glendaruel, Argyll.
March 18.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article