aWHILE not exactly bowing out on a high note, Lord Sainsbury will be leaving the supermarket chain when it appears to have found its feet again after its hiccup of the mid-1990s.
He has just witnessed the formal dethronement of Sainsbury as Britain's leading grocer to Tesco. The latter has been UK market leader since 1996 but Sainsbury's overall sales were still ahead when its US operation was taken into account.
Now even with this prop, Sainsbury has slipped to number two, while Tesco is well ahead in the UK.
However, lessons have been learned since Sainsbury allowed itself to become complacent and fall down on its product offering and marketing.
Most importantly, like-for-like sales are showing respectable growth, though still way behind Tesco, while margins have edged forward.
Sainsbury is improving the look of its stores and has firm plans for smaller convenience stores in city centres as well as home delivery.
There is nothing original in these ideas but the group is keeping up with current trends.
While it may have allowed Tesco to steal a march in loyalty cards, Sainsbury has done a good job with its bank, greatly helped of course by its partner Bank of Scotland. It should be in profit by the end of the year and looks like being the most successful of the new retail banks.
It should become a real moneyspinner in time.
However, the group's foray into the US is more problematical. Shaw's is strengthening its position in its market and is making progress in improving its performance. But one could not have a more competitive market than the US and the business does not have enough scale to do well.
Sainsbury will have to invest a lot more money to reach the necessary scale and it should have better uses for the capital.
Consolidation in the US supermarket sector should create a suitable exit.
Tesco's policy of growing in new markets like Eastern Europe and Asia looks a better bet for the long term.
At home, with or without its family chairman, Sainsbury is not going to catch up with Tesco now.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article