HIGHLAND Council wants the Government to protect sensitive communities, such as Knoydart, from speculative purchases by foreign or absentee landlords by giving such areas a special designation that requires much closer scrutiny of offers and takes into account community aspirations.
Feelings are running high on the issue following the news that two of Knoydart's new owners are Mr Charles Harrison, finance director of the Facia retailing empire which collapsed with debts of over #100m, and Mr Stephen Hinchliffe, Facia's chairman. Both are being investigated by the Serious Fraud Office for their stewardship of Facia, and the Department of Trade and Industry for the
collapse of another company.
Their arrival follows five years of uncertainty for Knoydart under the ownership of the financially troubled jute company Titaghur and its controversial chairman, Mr Reg Brealey.
In its response to the Government's Land Reform consultation paper, the council recommends the creation of Sites of Special Community Interest. Within these, communities should get rights of pre-emption or first refusal when the land is put on the market.
It also calls for prospective private purchasers to be subject to an audit, similar to the rigorous checks made on crofters.
The council states: ''They key issue surrounding ownership is the use to which land is put and the uses which are thereby denied. Very often it is with foreign or absentee landlords that problems arise, because their reasons for owning the land are more likely to be at variance with, or in ignorance of, local needs and aspirations.
''There is a case for seeking measures which would maximise the local residency of significant land owners, and to ensure that absentee or foreign landowners are in genuine partnership with local people.
''Land ownership would be far less attractive to unsuitable landlords if appropriate responsibilities, liabilities and accountability attached to the purchase and
continued ownership of land.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article