IT is always sad when a newspaper dies. Next week, however, the mourning will be among more than the redundant staff, when the Sporting Life puts out its last edition.
There are many punters who swear by the Life and regard the form in its great rival the Racing Post as totally unreadable. The Post, of course, has its devotees as well.
For example, around the table of doom (in a bookmaker's establishment somewhere in Central Scotland) 'Racing Post' Peter has always flown the flag for the smaller paper. But Peter has been in a minority. 'Duggie' George considers the Life to have by far the superior greyhound coverage. 'Desperate' Donald, one of Scotland's unknown but supremely talented joke-tellers, prefers the Life betting forecast when preparing another reckless plunge on the next favourite.
Even 'Cooncil Tax' Charlie, who admitted never buys either racing paper, prefers to pinch someone else's Life and would only borrow the Post as a last resort. The table of doom provides, as ever, a good insight into the rest of the country. The Sporting Life is a much more popular product than the Racing Post.
Why then you may ask is the last post for the Life as opposed to the end of the life of the Post? The answer seems largely to be in the relative redundancy terms of the staff of both papers. The Mirror Group, who now owns both titles, have found it more economic to pay off staff on the Life as opposed to the more favourable redundancy terms on the Post.
The original proposal to continue the Life as a general sports paper - the basis on which both titles moved into common ownership - has now been conveniently consigned to the out tray of history.
All of this is tough luck on some fine journalists. However, it is also a bad deal for punters round the country who have got used to their racing information being presented in a particular way.
A big effort is being made to upgrade the Post to incorporate the Life readership. However, the new paper will have an effective monopoly on daily racing information and it is difficult to see how that will operate in the punter's interest.
The table of doom's position as a weather vane of Scotland applies to more than racing. I could have told 'Tory' Blair some months ago that 'New' Labour was in substantial bother with former adherents. Perhaps Millbank Tower should sign up the table as a focus group.
Indeed, I have been authorised to say that the table is willing to listen to offers to provide such a service, with Forbes 'the cigar' placed in formal charge of any negotiations. There is one health warning. Some of the language in which the Prime Minister is described would make even Mo Mowlam blush.
Typically, this week's meeting at Chester exasperated punters. Any idea that the desperate bends at the course provide a good schooling for Epsom and Tattenham Corner should be discarded. Chester might provide a fair training for ballet but not for running in the Derby.
However, that is not the case for Lingfield today. The Derby trial (4.10) provides a small but pretty select field. I doubt if the Derby winner is among them but they are exciting prospects none the less.
My idea of the winner is the relative outsider ACHILLES with Jason Weaver aboard.
If Lingfield is a good grounding for Epsom, then the reverse is also true, and Achilles's effort in running The Glow-Worm close at that course last month looks good in light of the latter's fine run in the Chester Vase.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article