HAD the builders of the Skye bridge put the tollbooths on the Skye side of the bridge rather than at Kyle of Lochalsh, the Skye bridge cases would have been heard in Portree Sheriff Court and not 80 miles away in Dingwall, bailiwick of Sheriff James Fraser.

It was on his shoulders and those of the resident procurator-fiscal, David Hingston, that the bulk of the Skye bridge work fell. It was quite a load: about 400 prosecutions started; almost 130 completed; all peppered by appeals to relevancy and competency to the High Court, not to mention appeals against conviction.

Until last summer, when there was a change in prosecution policy, the Skye bridge campaigners were effectively clogging up the judicial system in the north. It was clear from the outset that the Crown Office did not appreciate the pressure that was being put on the court in Dingwall. What effect it had on Sheriff Fraser and Mr Hingston, hearing what was, in substance, the same case over and over again, we shall never know.

Without any thought of a campaign of direct action, the Government had made it a criminal offence not to pay the tolls without reasonable excuse, so all those who refused to pay had to be tried. The sheer volume of casework became ludicrous, but for more than a year there was no relief.

Although other sheriffs did and still do some of the work, it was Sheriff Fraser who became most closely associated with it in the public mind.

His reputation had gone before him; a notoriously short temper which would brook no mischief in his court, particularly from visiting lawyers from the south who might in any way appear to patronise. Lawyers, advocates, or QCs heading up from Edinburgh are counselled by fellow professionals, who have appeared in his court and do not always feel they are given a chance to develop their defence because of his bullying.

Certain other things are not done at Dingwall; for example, woe betide anyone who parks in Sheriff Fraser's reserved parking space, or even on occasion the one behind it.

For all his awesome reputation, Sheriff Fraser can display considerable humanity, going to some lengths to give some poor wrongdoer another chance to stay out of jail. A highly intelligent man, he is also possessed of considerable humour. What confuses most, however, is that the extremes of his temperament can follow hard on each other.

Despite it all, Sheriff Fraser very nearly established himself as a Skye hero. On June 10, he staggered most by warning that the Skye bridge legislation could be flawed in that it did not say who should pay the tolls.

He would not hear any other cases for a month while he pondered this proposition.

The absence of any formal identification of who was liable to pay the tolls was serious: ''I consider that to be a real argument on both sides. If I was to decide the point causing me concern in favour of the defence, then, subject to appeal, the Crown has no escape. If I was to decide that, the Crown can't succeed in this prosecution nor in any other.''

The implications for the Government would have been enormous, but Sheriff Fraser dismissed the complaint as irrelevant on

July 10.

The tolls stayed in place, however, because the Crown appealed, and on July 30 three appeal court judges overturned Sheriff Fraser's ruling. It was back to Dingwall.