What a glad, happy time it is to be a Scottish nationalist or, even better, the leader of the SNP. The strength and consistency of our System Three poll results on the question of voting intentions for a Scottish Parliament have shown the SNP overhauling Labour and now passing them in handsome manner. Yesterday's trend has become today's hard reality, although for Labour the more apt description is of harsh reality. In their heart of hearts the leadership of both Labour and the SNP do not really know why this is happening. Labour publicly dismisses the opinion polls and exhibits a worrisome trend, which the Tories used to delight in when bereft of anything sensible to say, of blaming the media for everything. The SNP can, and do, point to a number of Labour gaffes, of the damage which political sleaze has caused, and of the allegedly deleterious effects of Chancellor Gordon Brown's economic
policies on Scotland; all because they are seemingly designed for middle England. There may be elements in all of these factors which feed into the opinion-poll results but swallowed whole they are not convincing.
What, then, is happening? How has Labour, which is riding so high in nationwide opinion polls and which has a Westminster Government of almost unsurpassed popularity, managed to make such an unholy mess of convincing the Scottish electorate of its attributes, especially when it could boast of being the party which did most to bring about a Scottish Parliament as the very first manifesto pledge to be fulfilled? Frankly, it is unlikely that in such a short time and with only a year to go to the elections for the Scottish Parliament that the voters have been swayed in a remarkable manner by Mr Salmond's forensic analysis of Labour's faults and by his equally incisive exposition of SNP politics on everything from job
creation to the size of the armed forces after independence. Something less overtly conscious appears to be taking place and any analysis of it must be halting and served up with handsome dollops of hindsight.
Here goes. The establishment of a Scottish Parliament was meant in part to save the Union, as well it might, but it has also ushered in an era of specifically Scottish politics. We all bleated on about the Scottish dimension for years while discussing it in essence in the context of British politics. For nigh on two decades popular Scottish politics consisted of biffing the Tories who were perceived as an English party. It was good fun but it did not define the politics of Scotland. A Parliament does this. The SNP, without doing very much at all, is perceived as solidly Scottish and for obvious reasons. Labour under Mr Blair is not perceived as essentially Scottish any more, and the tone of New Labour policies has
reinforced that impression. If, then, we now have a specifically Scottish politics, Labour had better start operating more energetically within it, while realising the parameters within which they work. The new politics require a new Labour for Scotland but if it is New Labour, as applied seamlessly from London, it will continue to fail.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article