THE anguished father of a teenager kicked to death by three youths said last night he was outraged by the Crown's decision to accept their pleas of guilty to culpable homicide.
Mr Malcolm Ayton called for the judge to impose tough sentences on the youths, who had originally faced charges of murdering his son, Mark.
The High Court in Glasgow was told that Iain Wheldon and Graham Purves, both 17, and Ross Gravestocks, 16, booted 19-year-old mechanic Mark to death because he came from the wrong school.
The three accused were at Balerno High School, near Edinburgh, whose pupils fought at weekends with rival boys from Mark's old school, Currie High, in the neighbouring town.
Mr Ayton said last night: ''I am astonished that a fit and healthy youth being kicked and done to death can be anything other than murder. If it is not murder, then it must carry sentences commensurate with murder. I am just disappointed that the evidence from pathologists wasn't more positive to allow the trial to proceed on a charge of murder.When there were 18 blows to the head, it is an outrage that they accepted culpable homicide.''
Mr Ayton refused to discuss suggestions that the middle-class backgrounds of the convicted youths had played any part in the investigation or prosecution of the case. He dismissed defence claims that the inter-school rivalry had sparked the attack on his son. He said: ''I believe it all started because they were taunting Mark and his brother with anti-English comments.
''Those are the remarkable things about this case. The anti-English element and the quality of the families involved. You don't expect violence in a place like Balerno.
''It is a quiet town, with respectable families, and that's what makes this such a tragedy. ''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article