Going soft: the finest of cashmere, the merest hint of silk -
John Davidson considers
the allure of feel-good fibres
IF THIS was a fair country, the Government would be issuing every adult woman with a pastel-hued cashmere sweater this month. Overnight, national morale would be lifted. Confidence and productivity would soar. And the Prime Minister's popularity would reach even dizzier heights.
There would, you see, be some sound material substance to the mythical feel-good factor. For cashmere remains the king of touchy-feely fibres. And, in addition to its inherent luxury and gloriously tactile properties, it makes sound sense as a fashion choice for all the vagaries of our late spring weather.
Yarns in fine-gauge cashmere (and blends of cashmere with silk) make perfect choices for this season's dainty camisoles, sleeveless shell tops and lady-like little cardigans. But if the Government refuses to see sense - and cashmere in even its most moderately priced manifestations remains beyond your budget - opt for the distinctive yet subtle sheen of a viscose yarn.
Partnered with a pretty beaded skirt, such pretty knits articulate a key fashion idea of the moment: night-for-day dressing.
For, just as the fashion seasons seem to be morphing strangely together (remember last winter's plethora of sleeveless dresses?) the distinction is waning between what may be worn before and after dark. Designers are insisting that women should be free to wear pretty, ultra-feminine clothes - wherever they are going, and whatever the hour.
But will such alluring examples of low-key glamour really surface in the workplace? Only, please, if your job involves presenting The Big Breakfast.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article