There is little I know of Kevin Kelley, except that he is a boxer who has plied his trade with some dignity over two decades and 50 professional fights. It just seems to me that his sport would have benefited enormously had he managed, as seemed distinctly possible last Friday, to put a cork in the bottle of 'Prince' Naseem Hamed.
For the Naz phenomenon is as phoney as it is nasty and sullies the the spirit of true sportsmanship.
Hamed is a bright little lad from Sheffield and a talented, but far from invincible, featherweight fighter. What makes him different from most is that he has the ego of a heavyweight.
He does not only need to beat opponents, he has to taunt them. Kelley, he told us endlessly before a glove had been laced, ''would have his spark knocked out.'' In the event it was Hamed who almost ran short of a shilling for the meter, but he got off the floor to save his and many other people's investment.
For that is really what Hamed is all about; he is a money-making machine for himself and his backers, notably his manager, Frank Warren. When Hamed was dumped on the canvas three times during his 'triumph' in New York, Warren was the one in most pain.
He has apparently negotiated a deal worth $12m with a cable company. Defeats are not part of the agreement. Nor can his protege afford to behave like a civilised human being.
So Hamed will go on threatening to dispose of challengers in the most outlandish fashion. He will strut, pout, somersault into the ring in his leopardskin shorts and all the while, or at least until he gets caught with a good jab, the money meter will keep ticking.
There are two points often made in his defence. Does he not simply indulge in harmless hype? And did the great Muhammad Ali not take part in the same nonsense? The answers are 'no' and 'no.'
I don't particularly like boxing, but I have always admired boxers, who are usually the most honest of sportsmen. They do not fake injury and they normally have great respect for their opponents.
To believe that all is fair in the battle to sell tickets is to cheapen and demean the sport and its participants. I don't mind Hamed calling himself a Prince - after all, John 'Cowboy' McCormack did not own a ranch - but I object most strenuously to him treating everybody else as serfs.
Secondly, the comparisons with Ali are absurd. Thomas Hauser, Ali's biographer, was asked about similarities.
''The Prince is a Muslim and talks a lot,'' he opined. ''That's it, that's all they have in common.
''Ali said he was the 'Greatest' and he was. He was possibly the best-looking man in the world.
Nobody except the Prince's mother would suggest he is in the same category.''
Those who know the world of boxing intimately tell me there are featherweights who can punch a lot harder than Kevin Kelley. That is good news.
Sport has a way of handing out doses of humility at the most unexpected moments. That is something 'Prince' Naseem Hamed has yet to learn . . . and he will.
q It must be the spirit of Christmas that is making me good-humoured this week. What I would like from Santa, in addition to the de-throning of the 'Prince,' is the debunking of Arsenal's Ian Wright, a player who typifies everything that is rotten about professional football.
There are those who see Wright's on and off the field antics as the actions of a cheeky chappie. In reality, he is a foul-mouthed creep who is prepared to put fellow professionals in trouble to further his own career.
His latest escapade, screaming abuse at his own club's fans, has led to him being interviewed by the police. Can we hope that the FA, a body with all the moral fibre of yesterday's chewing gum, will at last be able to impose some sanctions?
In a television commercial Wright insists he would have loved a meeting with Martin Luther King. The latter might have preferred a chat with the Little Rock Police.
q We were on our way to the Parc des Princes stadium in Paris, travelling in company with some SRU officials and their wives. Two gendarmes proceeded our coach, clearing a path through the traffic.
As we roared up a one-way street the wrong way, the man in seat next to me observed: ''If they had got their army to the Front this quickly, the course of history might have been changed.''
It was Jimmy Ross, president of the union in 1979-80, renowned referee and the proudest former pupil of George Heriot's that ever walked round Goldenacre
Jimmy was a journalist's delight, a man with an opinion on everything. Some of his best stories were told against himself.
On Monday, Jimmy Ross died. The rugby community has lost a great servant.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article