PERHAPS you reckoned that ventriloquism was harmless kids' stuff involving coy fluffy ducklings called Orville. Actually, the voice-throwers' art was invented by Satan.
Yon persuasive evil spirit Mephistopheles was Old Nick's original right-hand man - right-hand man, get it? - and, speaking on his master's behalf, Mephi-boy granted self-deluding dupes their earthly desires in exchange for eternal possession of their souls. The pay-off? An afterlife of endless brimstone, fire, and white-hot pokers up the fundament. New-wave vent David Strassmann has set his act in a similar theatre of cruelty.
Revisiting the scene of his first successful UK foray, on the 1996 Edinburgh Fringe, Strassmann continues to probe ventriloquism's infernal roots with his skilful deployment of devil-doll Chuck Wood. Chuck swears, spits, boaks demonically, acts flip and cynical, threatens murder, and has plainly seen The Exorcist too often. He's funny, too.
Chuck's possession of his human partner provided Tuesday night's opening half with a compelling storyline, underlined by Chuck's chilling admonition: ''You need me to say the things you don't got the balls to say, Strassmann.''
In this first hour an audience can't help but be wowed by Strassmann's subtly dramatic physical operation of his dolls, and by his ability to stage seamless bits of four-way comic cross-talk. There's also the wholly engaging Teddy Bear, a furry friend who contrasts with Chuck by being cuddlesome, self-doubting, and innocent.
After the break it's a different story, though. Bitty. Cutesy-pie singing dinosaurs brought alive by computer animatronic technology. A couple of dolls without characters to support them.
Overall? Hellish competent, but little more.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article