Gulf War veterans yesterday said they were disappointed that the Government had again not answered their questions over the mystery illnesses affecting them.
The group had threatened to walk out of the meeting with Armed Forces Minister John Reid, but despite staying said they felt he had failed to address the issue.
While Dr Reid described the meeting at the Ministry of Defence as constructive, members of the National Gulf Veterans and Families Association said they remained unhappy. The meeting also included representatives from the Royal British Legion and the Gulf Veterans' Association. The groups are campaigning for recognition of the illnesses which have affected thousands in the services who served in the 1991 Gulf War. They also want the publication of a previous study into their
illnesses.
However Shaun Rusling, of the NGVFA, said they were forced to accept Dr Reid's reasons for not publishing that report, which looked at the first 500 veterans reporting symptoms. Instead, the Minister said he hoped a report detailing the diagnosis of 1000 veterans would soon be released.
Mr Rusling said: ''We're not happy with what the Minister has said. He was still unable to answer the questions we asked a year ago.
''He couldn't answer why NHS hospitals and doctors are diagnosing and treating veterans with Gulf War syndrome while the MoD fails to do so. And he was unable to explain why two veterans a month are committing suicide because of the lack of action.''
After the two-hour meeting, Dr Reid said he was pleased the veterans had chosen to stay and listen to what he had to say.
''I understand there has been some plans to walk out and I am glad to say we were able to discuss these issues.
''I understand the frustrations of the veterans, who are in a difficult position. They want answers which so far medical science
hasn't provided,'' he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article