COUNCILLORS were urged yesterday to end their squabbling over who pays for the education of children with learning difficulties or those requiring specialist education.
The plea came from Cosla chief executive Douglas Sinclair after councillors had failed to agree on a banding system aimed at simplifying charging and reducing the number of disputes between authorities.
The problem is yet another consequence of local government reorganisation whereby a new unitary authority is billed if it sends a child into another authority for special educational needs.
Charges could range from #10,000 for children with moderate learning or social/emotional difficulties to #52,000 for seven-day residential provision for children with complex multiple learning difficulties.
After a lengthy discussion at Cosla's Education and Cultural Forum, at which councillors failed to agree on a charging formula, Mr Sinclair said: ''Clearly there isn't consensus on this issue, and I think it is important local authorities are seen to get their act together. I think the public image of councils fighting each other is not in the interests of local government.''
The problem for some authorities is that they feel that those providing special educational needs are in effect being paid twice for providing the service - once through Government grant, and secondly by billing the authority in which the child is resident.
Renfrewshire's convener of education, Mr Brian Oldrey, was unable to accept the banding system proposed by Cosla's head of finance, Mr Norie Williamson. In his view, the problem revolved around how to identify clearly and specifically what amount of grant was given to a council for special needs provision.
He said: ''If I had a child in my area who received through grant a specific amount of special needs money and Councillor Malcolm Green wanted that for Glasgow - and if he can identify that clearly and specifically - there isn't a problem between us. But there is a problem because no-one can identify that amount of grant and a lot of this money is absorbed as part of an overall budget to meet staffing costs.
''In those circumstances, there's clearly an element in my mind that I'm required to pay staffing costs twice, and I don't think that is reasonable. As for the view that we're seeking uniformity, we've had uniformity - the uniformity of one cost for all. It isn't uniformity that we're looking for, it is in fact an equity in how we provide children with special educational needs. Perhaps we should withdraw this report.''
Some members were reluctant to throw out banding completely. Others were puzzled by an apparent contradiction in the document - that the actual costs should be taken into consideration while, in another section, it is suggested that a banding system should apply.
Councillors did agree to the setting up of a member working group to search for a solution.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article