On April 25, you carried a letter by AB of Glasgow, about finding work. I was in a similar situation eight months ago, and feel able to offer some constructive advice. Firstly, AB should not give up hope. It only takes one successful application to get a job.
Secondly, a good CV or interview technique is not an automatic guarantee of anything: everybody else does these as well. What is it that makes the difference in his or her case, and hence get the employment he wants?
Thirdly, the point you make about starting salary is entirely justified. AB's self belief is good, but salary is (in private commerce at least) usually based on experience, results and ability, not necessarily age. Employers always want to know what you can do for them.
Consequently, a ''get-his-foot-in-the-door'' point of view would be more constructive. Once there he can demonstrate his abilities and command a higher salary. Apart from anything else, if AB knows what the going rate is for his work, then this demonstrates to employers a certain level of knowledge in his proposed area. My own professional body circulates this type of information for my profession, as well as changes in work trends. I found this a useful reference, as I could back up my point of view, rather than simply make a guess.
AB seems to be bitter about people who got jobs through contacts (parents, friends etc). In my experience I have found this an excellent way to get work.
Very often it puts you ahead of the
crowd, the person knows you, and so knows what they are getting. This makes the difference, as from the employer's point of view they are not employing an unknown quantity.
In a world where everyone has the same qualifications as you do, this must be to your advantage.
name and address supplied
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article