Most open cars which spend at least some of their time on business are four-seat convertible versions of saloons, but it is surprising how many people manage to justify running a two-seater on a company account. Of course, if you have no real need to haul three passengers around, why not go for the fun of the thing?
Some two-seaters, or two-plus-twos for manufacturers who are feeling optimistic, are open-top adaptations of a coupe design. There are some purposeful high-performance cars in this group, the Ferrari F355, Aston Martin DB7, Porsche Carrera 911, Jaguar XK8 and XKR notable among them. In a sub-division you can include the Alfa Romeo Spider, a spectacular car with slam-it-to-them styling, and the Toyota Celica.
Then there are the examples with no fixed-roof variant. We are in sports car territory here, but the best of these are perfectly reasonable all-week transport. The MGF and Mazda MX-5 are among the middle-sized types, while the Lotus Elise is a no-compromise brilliant handler. Smaller British-owned manufacturers, in a part of the market where ''comfortable'' and ''well equipped'' may be rather variable definitions, chip in with cars like Morgan, Marcos and TVR.
It is sometimes forgotten that the Germans are well represented in the two-seater open-car market. BMW began with the retro-styled and modestly powered 1.9-litre Z3 roadster, but has extended that range to include a more powerful 2.8 and the formidable M Roadster.
The Mercedes SLK with its neat roof-into-the-boot arrangement can be a coupe at one moment, and a convertible about 15 seconds later. The top class two-seater in the Mercedes catalogue is the SL, which comes with a choice of 2.8, 3.2, five-litre and six-litre engines. When you get to the AMG-modified SL60, you are talking about one of the world's great road cars.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article