CHILDREN born using ICSI - an in-vitro fertilisation technique that allows infertile men to be fathers - may have slower mental development than children conceived naturally, research being published today suggests.
The findings, in the Lancet, are based on a study in Australia and indicate that ICSI children have a significantly greater than average chance of suffering delayed mental development at one year old.
ICSI, or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, entails taking an individual sperm in a glass injector and injecting it into an egg. In this way a man with a low sperm count can be given a much higher chance of fathering.
The technique, developed in Belgium, was hailed as a breakthrough when introduced in 1993 and has since been widely adopted at clinics all over the world. The first Scots children conceived in this way were born in 1995 after the procedure was performed at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary.
Tens of thousands of children are now thought to have been born worldwide as a result of ICSI. But some critics have warned that little is known about the possible long-term effects on children conceived in this way.
Researchers led by Dr Jennifer Bowen, from the Department of Neonatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonard's, New South Wales, compared 89 ICSI children with 84 children born after routine In-Vitro Fertilisation and 80 who were conceived naturally.
There were no physical differences between them, but 17% of the ICSI children showed ''mildly or significantly delayed development'' at one year old. This compared with just 2% for the traditional IVF children and 1% for those who were naturally conceived.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article