IRISH Olympic swimming
champion Michelle de Bruin may go to court over action by the sport's international body that could see her suspended for life.
FINA, swimming's international governing body, said yesterday that Ms de Bruin's case, centring on alleged manipulation of a drugs test, was to be tried by its doping panel.
The organisation disclosed that analysis of a second urine sample provided by the swimmer at her home in Kilkenny last January had indicated ''suspicion of physical manipulation''. The disciplinary hearing could go ahead next month.
But last night, Peter Lennon, the gold medallist's Dublin lawyer, said he was ''furious'' at the FINA move.
He declared: ''We have told FINA that unless they withdraw all charges on the basis of there being a negative finding in this case, we will be applying to CAS (the Swiss-based Court of Arbitration for Sport) for an injunction.
''If CAS won't take the case - because they may take the view they have no jurisdiction in the matter -we will be applying to the courts in Switzerland.''
Mr Lennon told Irish radio the press release about Ms de Bruin's case had come as a surprise because he had been in touch with FINA all day about the affair.
''More importantly, it confirms there is no doping offence in this particular case. In fact, the charges against Michelle Smith de Bruin should be withdrawn.''
Mr Lennon said there was nothing specific in the FINA statement - other than a suspicion of manipulation of the sample.
''One would have thought that since their own rules provide that confidentiality will be observed by all persons connected with doping control, until such time as the competitor is sanctioned in accordance with FINA rules, they should have had the common decency in this case to have informed the athlete, or her solicitors, that this was what they were doing, rather than issuing a press release internationally.''
Mr Lennon said he would be advising Ms de Bruin to proceed with an injunction application.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article