The Government was urged yesterday to create an alternative to baptism for non-religious families.
Labour peer Lord Young of Dartington, chairman of the Baby Naming Society, has submitted the plan to the Government committee on the family.
He warned that baptism was in decline and called for an alternative naming ceremony which could be conducted outside of the Church.
The registrars of birth - who currently just record births - should be re-trained to conduct such ceremonies, Lord Young told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme.
''Baptism is something that can only be conducted in a Church,'' he said.
''Alternative ceremonies, welcoming ceremonies, for children, can be conducted anywhere the parents want.
''As ordinary baptisms are declining in all churches, except perhaps the Catholic church, so there needs to be some alternative.
''The baptism is a very valuable ritual and it exists in many racial minorities in Britain and it has existed for many hundreds of years.
''But now, unfortunately, it is in decline and a new ritual is needed for a very important occasion for parents and grandparents and families generally,'' Lord Young said.
Such ceremonies were often conducted now by members of the family in the garden, or in a hotel, with Godparents sometimes called co-parents instead.
However many couples wanted a formal, structured ceremony conducted by an official, he said.
Nicholas Coote, assistant secretary of the Catholic Bishops Conference, said non-religious people were abusing the ceremony of baptism.
''One has a problem in the Church when people come for a baptism and you know fairly well that they have no intention of living as Christians or bringing up their child as Christians,'' he said.
''If they're not believing Christians, baptism is really abused.
''I can see no objection to a secular alternative to baptism for what people call generally rites of passage, whether it's death, the naming of a baby or marriage,'' he said.
However it was not the state's job. It was the job of a voluntary society, he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article