ON May 22 you reported how the Rev Dan Bryant, from Springfield, Oregon, told a hushed General Assembly of the tragedy which had hit his home town. That day he spoke through tear-stained eyes of the awful pain and grief caused by a 15-year-old boy, brought up in a gun culture and on a daily diet of television violence. For many of those present, memories flooded back of the massacre of the innocents in Dunblane.
It is now generally accepted that ''mad-cow disease'', which has had such devastating implications for the British meat industry, was caused by feeding cheap but alien material to cattle. Many scientists continue to be worried about the long-term effects of introducing vast quantities of hormones and antibiotics, pesticides and herbicides to the food chain and nature's delicate balances. They fear it could trigger off a series of gradual, but dangerous, changes.
I am equally concerned about the long-term effects of a media in which the worst values are constantly on display and the best rarely whispered. From an early age, cheap, violent, and lustful images are entering the minds and bloodstream of the young.
A decade ago those who questioned the practices of feeding cattle to cattle, and intensive chemically-aided farming, were pilloried. Fortunately the tide has turned. Our collective psyche has been disturbed by recent events.
I wonder how long it will be before people realise how people's minds are also being poisoned by much of the garbage they are being fed by the tabloid press, sex-saturated magazines, and some television programmes. The availability of pornography on the Internet is now another major concern.
Yet still some regard as eccentric those of us who keep pointing out the long-term dangers. Surely we should treat our children's minds at least as gently as their stomachs? Unhealthy thoughts and images have a way of working themselves out into deeds.
This being so, we ought to be more concerned about the long-term physical, emotional, social, and cultural damage being caused by the constant bombardment of the minds of the young and the vulnerable, some of whom now have sexual relationships before they have learned how to make any other kind of lasting relationship. Should we really be surprised that we now have such a high teenage pregnancy rate, and 29-year-old grandmothers?
Abraham Lincoln was right when he said that the real power in a nation lies not with those who shape its laws, but with those who shape its public opinion.
Very Rev Dr James A Simpson,
The Manse, Pitcairngreen, Perth.
May 25.
THE recent Channel 4 ''documentary'' on the effect of the latest firearms legislation on gun clubs merely continues the media onslaught on shooters and their sport. It appears that there are no depths to which these so-called reporters will not stoop in order to malign decent sportsmen, including breaking the existing law to sensationalise their grubby little programme.
The muzzle-loaded-pistol hysteria now being generated is based on ''concealability'', as if any of the recent atrocities were committed by adults or children who cared who saw them murder. This logic appears to have escaped the anti-gun lobby, or it may be the only hook they have left on which to hang their prejudices and try to frighten a gullible public.
For my own part, I find it grossly offensive that all shooters should be classed as potential child-killers. Lord Cullen certainly did not take this view, but his report was swept aside in the dash for votes at the last election.
As the Home Office continues to drag its feet over compensation to thousands of pistol owners whose property has been confiscated, it may be opportune for some enterprising journalist to try to uncover the real cost of the Firearms Amendment Act before any other legislative stupidity is forced upon us.
Ian Thomson,
3 Hilltop Place, Ayr. May 23.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article