EVIDENCE is growing that a mighty comet smashed into the earth just a few thousand years ago, impacting on the myths and religion of early civilisations.
Numerous ancient writings, including prophecies such as the Book of Revelation in the Bible, appear to describe cataclysmic events involving objects falling from the sky. Now researchers are starting to uncover scientific evidence that something catastrophic and climate-changing happened more than 4,000 years ago.
Tree-ring studies of Irish Oaks by scientists at Queen's University, Belfast, have revealed that around 2354-2345 BC there was an abrupt downturn in the climate.
Archaeologists carrying out digs in Northern Syria have discovered signs of a catastrophic environmental event occurring at about the same time. Their analysis reveals evidence of widespread destruction caused by what was described as a ''blast from the sky''.
Around this time, there was a near simultaneous collapse of Bronze Age civilisations.
Dr Bill Napier, an astronomer at Armagh Observatory, and Dr Victor Clube, from Oxford and Armagh Universities, have been investigating the evidence of a major comet impact in the third millennium BC.
Writing in Frontiers magazine, Dr Napier suggests that the Comet Encke, first observed in 1786, might be a remnant of the object along with its associated stream of meteors, called the Taurids.
This giant mother-comet is thought to have been actively disintegrating as recently as 5,000 years ago. At this time, and for some millennia afterwards, the night sky would have been lit up by a bright zodiacal light.
Dr Napier wrote: ''One of the most puzzling features of early societies is their preoccupation with the sky. People have assumed that this was driven by the need for a calendar. But this does not account for the doom-laden nature of their early sky-centred cosmic religions.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article