IT WAS a short speech, and the issue which has commanded so many column inches in recent days merited only 120 words.
Yet they said much more, subtly too. But not enough for the thousands of prisoners of war who suffered such terrible brutality at the hands of their Japanese captors and whose representatives mounted their dignified protest yesterday.
Japan properly had a rigidly-imposed constitution and system of government imposed upon it after the war which prevents its Emperor from making political statements. True, this has become a political issue.
But no political statement was required and it is a great pity that Emperor Akihito felt the weight of post-war history so heavily that he was unable to go as far as those former PoWs, who are still burdened by their awful war experiences, wanted.
The Emperor's remarks might have been so subtle as to appear bland, but he was right also to be thinking of the many millions who suffered horribly during the war, among them the innocent Japanese at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. And his promise never to forget during his State visit those who still bear scars, indeed to feel sorrow and pain on their behalf, was clearly aimed at the British former PoWs.
That will never be enough for those who want, probably even more strongly with each passing year, an explicit apology. But with each passing year their want will recede, not for reasons of reconciliation, sadly, but because of age and infirmity
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article