New Jersey
THE Scotland manager, Craig Brown, will gather his players around him at their New Jersey hotel today and spell out the disciplinary facts of life which will be in force during the World Cup finals.
Brown is concerned at the new rules which will be in place in the build-up to the games in France. These include red cards for a tackle from behind and for talking back to referees.
As the World Cup squad flew out to the US, Brown observed: ''The disciplinary code is going to make things more difficult for our lads. We shall have to work on this while we are in America, in training and in the team talks, and as far as the players are concerned, the World Cup starts in the States.
''It was not possible to do anything about this before now because we couldn't ask players to play differently in the friendly games when, in fact, they had club games still to take place where these rules were not going to apply.
''We had hoped that Scotland's refereeing representative at the finals, Hugh Dallas, would have seen the players yesterday but he is on holiday and his visit, when he will outline some of the new rules, will take place just before we leave for France.
''While we are in the States, I feel sure that the referees will follow the guidelines which have emerged from FIFA.
''On Saturday, against Colombia in New York, we will have to be careful. In many ways getting this part of our approach right becomes almost as important as the team structure. If you get the team right and then you have a player sent off in 10 minutes, it doesn't do you much good.''
As he began to outline the problems facing the players, Brown added: ''If a player is sent off for kicking the ball away, or for dissent, that would be unforgivable. If anyone is sent off for a tackle, that is slightly different - it can happen in the heat of the game.
''Some of the players will have to be more careful than others. For instance, Billy McKinlay collected quite a number of yellow cards in the Premiership. I have to try to get Billy to tone down his tackles, but I have to do that in such a way that I don't curb his natural enthusiasm. When you are talking of dissent now, you are meaning that players simply cannot talk to referees at all. If they do then they risk being red-carded.''
The situation regarding the new rules has been further complicated by the fact that, with just three weeks to the big kick-off, FIFA still does not have a long-promised video ready for referees and teams to show what kind of offences will get an automatic red card.
Despite the urgency - most teams are deeply into their preparations for the finals - the video has not made it beyond FIFA's referee committee. It is expected that it will be another week before approval will be given.
Scotland's David Will, head of the FIFA referee committee, had an explanation for the delay. ''It's not easy,'' he said. ''The video is expected to have around 18 tackles to be divided into three categories, showing tackles that should only be fouls, others that deserve a yellow card, and a final batch that should be red carded. ''In the end it will come down to the referee,'' said Will.
Normally, Brown does not concern himself over the disciplinary record of the Scotland squad - with just John Spencer having been sent off in a friendly during Brown's managership - but, now, the manager recognises the fresh problems which will have to be addressed.
As well as that, he must put the finishing touches to the team he wants to put out onto the field against Brazil in the tournament's opening game next month. He says: ''We could have gone and looked for easy fixtures. We could have gone to somewhere such as Italy and had the heat training we wanted and played against Cyprus and Malta and given ourselves a much easier build-up.
''However, this is what we wanted. It will not affect us psychologically if we lose the matches before facing Brazil as long as the performances are good.
''As far as I'm concerned, Colombia are the second-best team in South America, just behind Brazil. And the United States are no longer novices at the game.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article