Twenty years separate the first and last play in this tremendous Pinter trilogy chosen by one of the canniest theatre programmers around, the Donmar's Sam Mendes.
I've no doubt he's on to a surefire hit - even though the three plays themselves, the early The Collection and The Lover from the 1960s and the later A Kind of Alaska, surprisingly, lack the archetypal sense of menace so associated with the Pinter style and so vividly conjured, for example, in Roger Michell's National Theatre production last year of The Homecoming. Instead, directors Karel Reisz and Joe Harmston
seem to have opted for something wholly lighter, more naturalistic, as if to wipe that much over-
used adjective ''Pinteresque'' of its
starchier connotations.
Indeed, Pinter himself in the role of Harry - the older ''collector'' of men as well as chinoiserie in The Collection - leads the assault on the stuffier aspects of his reputation by playing with a mischief and cheekiness that makes you realise reverence has definitely been in the eyes of the beholders.
Playfulness, rightly or wrongly, is the abiding note of this trilogy - in Penelope Wilton's Deborah awaking from a 29-year-old sleep, a stroppy 16-year-old in the body of a forty-something; in the sparring between Douglas Hodge's wide-boy jealous husband and Colin McFarlane's trendy black clothes designer; and in the afternoon frolics of Hodge and Lia Williams in The Lover. If the result is less overtly threatening than expected - Hodge and Williams particularly seem low on erotic spark - the trilogy itself remains a fascinating study, satire and surreality intermingling, of possession, power, memory, and truth. They don't come more stylish.
n Three By Pinter is at the Donmar to June 13 and supported by The Laura Pels Foundation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article