STEWART Lamont (May 22) is a magician. A little wave of his delete key and lo! my proposal, which simply asked the Kirk to accept ''as valid'' the view of Holy Scripture which treats all of it as God's Word, became a rejection of everyone else. The deliverance in my name asked no more than that the view be accepted as a valid one among the spectrum in the Kirk. It rejoiced in diversity; Mr Lamont made it an imposition of uniformity. It allowed for the tantalising complexity of Christian obedience; Lamont transmogrified it into superficial certainty.
Of course there are strident evangelicals, just as there are strident journalists. What still astonishes, however, even after 30 years after joining the Church, is the dismissive spirit in which those who revere the whole Bible are marginalised.
They have good reason, after all, for that delight; they meet there a Father and a Saviour. They find there a miraculous acceptance and a free pardon. Their reverence, too, is well-founded; they do not dare, in Calvin's words, to ''impugn the credibility of Him who speaks''.
Mr Lamont preaches about tensions in the Church. Does he think that prejudicing a debate in advance by misrepresentation is the best way of resolving them? Perhaps when he turns down the light and turns up the heat, he contributes the problem.
C Peter White
66 Woodend Drive, Glasgow.
May 22.
I AM writing in response to Stewart Lamont's Comment (May 22) in respect of his remarks about the Highland Theological Institute.
Mr Lamont speaks of the institute as ''fundamentalist-friendly''. He knows very well that this is a theological insult which we would vigorously repudiate. If he is unable to write intelligently without labelling people (which seems to be the case) then we would accept ''evangelical and reformed''.
We would, however, accept the term ''friendly''. We do try to be friendly, even to people like Mr Lamont who (deliberately?) misrepresent us.
My main concern, is that Mr Lamont leaves readers with the impression that the General Assembly passed a critical motion about the Highland Theological Institute. This is not true. What he fails to mention is that the General Assembly approved an uncontested motion which was positive towards the institute.
The final motion reads: ''The General Assembly applaud the establishment of the University of the Highlands and Islands Project and commend the work of the Highland Theological Institute as part thereof and encourage them to work on the development of their theological courses''.
Mr Lamont is usually an entertaining writer but his prejudices do sometimes surface!
Rev Dr A T B McGowan,
Director,Highland Theological Institute,
Moray Street, Elgin. May 22.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article