WHEN first I began to cover the farming scene, only about three and a half years ago, I recall a senior Scottish Office civil servant telling me the boys who were really coining it were the dairy farmers, writes Robert Ross, Farming Editor.
''With the milk cheque coming in regularly every month it's as good as being on a salary,'' he said.
By comparison, incomes today are down about 40% and the milk sector is one of the most strident in demanding that the government should be pitching in with assistance.
A favourite line from Ministers is that this disastrous year follows hard on the heels of one or two very profitable years - therefore the industry should be able to ride out the storm.
The NFUS milk convener has dismissed that argument as ''pathetic''. The money from the good years was used to invest in upgrading systems to meet new quality standards, he says. Like good entrepreneurs producers ploughed profits back into the business and now they are suffering because the Government will not trigger the mechanisms which would compensate for the strength of sterling.
Whether you sympathise with the dairy sector or not you would have to accept that it is a bad time to be in the business of producing milk.
Those who are wondering which way to turn would have found little comfort in attending last week's Scottish Dairy Conference.
Most of the keynote speakers were agreed that quotas would have to go in time and farmers should look to the world market, where current prices are 11p a litre, about 5p or 6p less than our producers get just now. That prospect may be all right for the big players but it is little wonder that Scottish Milk chairman John Duncan pointed out such talk was enough to induce a weakening of the bowels among those operating on a smaller scale.
Ian Gardiner, policy director of the English NFU, recalled that he had been in at the beginning of the milk quota system and hoped also to be around to witness its demise.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article