With Lancia having given up building in right-hand drive, and Fiat offering no suitable cars here, it is left to Alfa Romeo to keep an Italian presence in the UK executive market.
The Alfa Romeo 156, European Car of the Year, may lie outside this market sector in its lower-powered editions, but the 2.5-litre V6 has vivid straight line performance to go with its spectacular appearance. It is a serious long-distance, mile-eating sports saloon.
While some elements of the design, such as the jocularly "invisible" rear door handles and the deliberately retro look of some of the interior features, might seem to disqualify the 156 as a serious executive car, Alfa Romeo is one of Europe's patrician marques.
The largr, older 164 is another car with an individual presence on the road. The three-litre V6 engine gives the top-line variants strong performance, and the ultimate Cloverleaf model is particularly well equipped. If you want to drive an Alfa and really sock it to them, then for sheer impact
nothing much beats the GTV coupe.
Like the 156, its bold exterior design sketches pretty well made it into production without being watered down by a nervous approval committee.
Italy is well represented in the rarefied category of exotic cars with which highly successful people like to reward themselves.
Ferrari, one of the great international brand names, is perhaps the ultimate example, with its 456M GT, the dramatic F555 coupe and convertible, and the 550 Maranello.
Lamborghinis are imported in very small numbers by Porsche Cars GB. In contrast, there are signs of an upsurge of activity at Maserati, now run in tandem with Ferrari.
The two makes will co-operate in technical matters but keep their model lines apart. The revised Maserati Quattroporte will be here in the summer, and should soon be joined by a splendid looking Giugiaro-styled coupe.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article