The E-coli inquiry heard yesterday that it was ''nothing short of a minor miracle'' that there had not been a food poisoning outbreak at John Barr's butcher's shop before the epidemic that killed 21 people.
Food safety consultant Dr Richard North said that, when the Wishaw butchers started in a small way, the working lay-out had been adequate.
But as the business grew, the lay-out was no longer adequate and there was a very real and unavoidable risk of cross-contamination from raw meats to cooked meat products, he stated.
He added: ''It's nothing short of a minor miracle there had not been a food poisoning outbreak earlier.''
Parts of Dr North's report had been put to food safety consultant, Dr Lisa Ackerley, who said she did not agree with all the points made by Dr North.
She said E-coli 0157 cross-contamination can occur in small as well as bigger businesses.
Dr Ackerley is a director of Hygiene Audit Systems Ltd, of St Albans, who compiled a hazard analysis report to improve food safety at Mr Barr's shop and another on the November 1996 outbreak for the Hamilton procurator fiscal. Referring to Dr North's report she said: ''You could say any butcher's shop prior to this event was a disaster waiting to happen.''
During cross-examination by Colin Sutherland, QC for North Lanarkshire Council, Dr Ackerley admitted several points in her report to the fiscal were wrong.
Dr Ackerley said she did not think the truth would ever be known as to just how the outbreak occured. ''Its unfair to put me on the spot as to what product caused the illness, where and how.''
The Motherwell inquiry continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article