LEADING conservation groups are asking Scottish Secretary Donald Dewar to make Scotland's new Parliament building green and clean.
Among the features proposed by the Scottish Wildlife Trust - whose patron is the Prince of Wales - and Friends of the Earth, Scotland, are solar heating, recycled materials and staff being encouraged to cycle to work.
They also want bird nesting boxes incorporated into the building's walls, heat reclaimed and recycled from expelled air and waste water during winter - and a regular environmental audit of the building's green performance.
In a joint letter to the Minister, Nigel Doar, campaigns co-ordinator for the SWT, and Dr Richard Dixon, head of research for FoES, say the new building must ''lead the way in environmental standards for new construction.''
''We hope very much that the environmental impacts used in constructing the Parliament building will be taken into account when deciding between different possible designs,'' they say.
''The use of timber from sustainably managed sources, the appropriate use of recycled materials, and the use of materials from sources as near to Edinburgh as possible, would be desirable.''
The groups also want an integrated public transport system that does not rely on getting to the building by motor car. They also want showering and changing facilities in the new Parliament to encourage staff to cycle or walk to work - as well as a new railway station at Holyrood.
The groups say that they want to see as much green space as possible around the building, not only for people to relax in and wildlife to flourish, but good tree planting will also increase energy efficiency and filter pollution from the air.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article