Campaigners yesterday criticised a kit which drug-takers can use to test substances as an irresponsible money-making venture.
Mr Dylan Trump, who is behind the scheme, claimed the kit would provide information to people using illegal drugs.
Mr Trump said the kit - which works by matching a drug sample with a range of colour codes for different substances - allowed users to be clearer about what they were buying.
Mrs Jan Betts, however, the mother of Leah Betts who died in 1995 after taking ecstasy on her eighteenth birthday, said Mr Trump's claims were ''complete nonsense'' and ''irresponsible''.
''Mr Trump is totally misinformed. The thing about ecstasy is that very few people die but it's the other effects that are the problem,'' she said, adding that it would be simple to devise a method of fooling the kit.
Mrs Betts, who now runs a helpline for drug-users with her husband, said she wholeheartedly endorsed comments by the Government-appointed drug czar, Mr Keith Hellawell, who said the kit was an ''immoral money-making venture''.
Mr Hellawell told BBC Radio 4 he would be taking the matter up with the Government. ''It's something we ought to stop before it starts,'' he said.
The kit was also criticised by the Glasgow-based anti-drugs group, Calton Athletic, which advocates complete abstinence from drugs.
Mr David Main, a spokesman for the group, said: ''It's not going to make any difference to know what you're taking.
''People will take drugs one way or another and I can't see too many people bothering to test things before they buy them.''
Mr Main said the kit was the equivalent of providing an operating theatre in a night club to deal with stab wounds rather than preventing people carrying knives.
Mr Trump, whose company acts as the UK distributor for a Dutch company, Spank Products, responded to the criticism by saying neither the kit nor its advertising encouraged drug use.
He added: ''We are encouraging people to test drugs not use more.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article