Historic Scotland was accused of putting money before the monster and a famous ruined castle at a public inquiry yesterday into the conservation body's application for a major #4m tourist development on Loch Ness.
The organisation, charged with safeguarding the nation's heritage, was also criticised for planning to erect an eyesore at Urquhart Castle, one of the most photographed landmarks in Scotland.
Historic Scotland, which looks after the sixteenth-century ruined castle, wants to build a car park for 118 cars, coaches, and caravans, a tearoom to seat 70, a shop, and a visitor centre.
Although Scottish Heritage does not require planning permission, it had to make a courtesy ''notice of proposed development'' to Highland Council, which rejected the proposal.
The Scottish Office ordered a public inquiry and Scottish Office reporter William Patterson began hearing evidence yesterday, not in Drumnadrochit, where suitable premises could not be found, but 13 miles away in an Inverness hotel. It is expected to last two weeks.
The organisation's north region director, Mr Robert McIlwraith, defended the proposals, which he said would end the turning away of tens of thousands of visitors to the castle every year and ''rid them of all the disappointment that entails''.
However, Highland Council's senior representative at the inquiry, Mr Alan Simpson, suggested the motivation was money, and not improved access. ''The suspicion people have about this development is that the financial element has always been obscured,'' he said.
The entire plan has led to an outcry in the bustling tourism village of Drumnadrochit, two miles from the castle, where traders fear any commercial development could devastate their businesses.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article