PROPOSALS which would split the National Cattle Association into beef and dairy factions are expected to meet heavy opposition at an extraordinary meeting today.
A straw poll of the various bodies involved showed dairy societies very much against and top beef groups for, suggesting smaller beef breed groups might tip the balance.
Ayrshire dairy farmer and NCA chairman Billy Kilpatrick admits that finances - beef producers feel they are the main contributors but get least benefit - and the continuing BSE crisis are the main factors in moves to either wind up the association or to create two subsidiary companies within its umbrella.
He also admitted he had no idea how the vote would go, particularly as the many proxy voters were given only 24 hours to return their forms.
Individuals have one vote while breed societies have 10 per 1000
members, or part thereof.
This gives considerable weight to the Holstein Friesian Society with its 12,600 members and which is firmly in favour of the status quo, as is the Ayrshire Cattle Society.
However, beef breed societies such as the Aberdeen-Angus, Limousin, and Charolais, not to mention Hereford breeder John Cameron, Balbuthie, Fife, chairman of the Scottish Beef Council - are convinced a split is vital to restore the flagging fortunes of Britain's beef industry. The
Hereford Cattle Society is less convinced.
A decision could be announced after the meeting, but proxy votes may delay the result until Beef '98 at Balbuthie, Fife, on Friday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article