THE sheer scale of the intensive hunt for the missing Aberfoyle couple, Roddy and Annemarie Aitken, was a key factor in a fall in the detection rate and a rise in the overall crime rate of Central Scotland Police in the last year, writes James Freeman, Home Affairs Correspondent.
The adverse figures after years of dramatic falls in reported crime have proved a major disappointment for the force and Chief Constable William Wilson, although the actual rise was only of a tiny handful of 24 crimes and the detection rate fell 2.66% from 56.11% - one of the highest figures in the UK. It remains 17% above the national average.
Mr Wilson put the crime rise into context by revealing that the 15,955 reported crimes for 1997/98 were a 0.15% increase on the previous year but the crime rate for last year remained more than 36% below that of seven years ago. ''Although disappointed that the reductions have not continued, I am pleased that our low level of crime has been maintained,'' he said.
He advised the Central Scotland Joint Police Board that in the first month of the new year, crime had in fact dropped by 8%. Mr Wilson said he was ''justifiably proud'' of his force's detection rate: ''We remain one of the most successful forces in Scotland and indeed in Great Britain in this context.''
Councillor Jeanette Burness, convener of the board, said she was satisfied the figures represented ''just a temporary statistical blip in the overall performance of Central Scotland Police''.
Meanwhile, Scottish Home Affairs Minister Henry McLeish yesterday announced another #1.5m for CCTV schemes to fight crime in Scotland's streets, bringing the sum made available by the Government since the Challenge Funding competition began in 1995 to #5.5m.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article